Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

In this sixth installment of the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009) was overall just okay.  I found myself dozing off in a few scenes (or wishing I had).  Steve Kloves did a wonderful job on all the other Harry Potter movies, with the exception of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007) as that one was directed by Michael Goldenberg.

First comes first, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince follows Potter in his sixth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.  This time around, he works closely with Professor Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) to try and extract a specific memory from the new potions professor hired at Hogwarts, Professor Horace Slughorn (Jim Broadbent).  Dumbledore believes this specific memory could be the key to finding out critical information about young Voldemort when he was a student at Hogwarts, also known as Tom Riddle.  In the usual fashion of these Harry Potter films, a mysterious item also flags the attention of Potter’s interest in the unknown “Half-Blood Prince”.

The fantasy inspired series has always been able to catch most people’s imaginations, adults and children alike.  However, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince failed to do that this time around, at least for me.  With only a few action scenes, the movie appeared to have lost its whimsical charm and creative luster.  No doubt, there were traditional scenes that showcased J.K. Rowling’s bag of magical tricks, such as the love potions, the Peruvian darkness powder, memories stored in a bottle, etc.  However, there were a lot of conversational scenes that could have been deleted, as well as scenes that were — for the most part — uneventful and disconnected from any storyline.

Probably the #1 thing that bothered me most about the movie was that I just didn’t know where the story was going.  Maybe the movie lost me somewhere after Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) suddenly built a liking to Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), or maybe it was Harry Potter’s sudden love interest in Ron’s sister, Ginny (Bonnie Wright).  Yes, I see that we have to remember that the movie is following a group of teenagers in school where they still come across normal stages in their life apart from magic, but the problem was that it all seemed very random (pretty ironic use of the word in the context of a fantasy/adventure movie).

I didn’t feel as though I got anything out of this movie.  I hate to say it, but this installment seemed more like a filler for me — only filmed to get a few key scenes or plot points in there, but that was it.  It’s always Potter fighting the Dark Lord (we already know that) but at least put a little more pizazz in the movie to excite the audience.  Cheap tricks and brief zap attacks with the wand can only go so far.  I want to see more fireworks, not a little bug zap here and there.

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars — Average, but still worth watching


Two Movie Trailer Versions of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)

Harry Potter is back again! Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince opens in U.S. theaters on July 17, 2009. Who doesn’t like Harry Potter movies? I have not met one person. The trailers look awesome and the movie looks to be really good. Creativity really comes alive in these movies. J.K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter novels, must have been tapping into her inner child when she visualized and imagined such a fun story line. Not only do the Harry Potter movies deliver mystical fantasy scenes that tickle the creative mind, but they also tell a story of magical danger, good vs. evil, love and friendship in an extraordinary world.

Remember… July 17, 2009 (if you’re outside of the U.S., click here to get your release date). Mark your calendar!